The continued increases in gas prices has sparked a considerate amount of political talk because of its widespread impact on almost every single American. This article by Nelson Schwartz from the NY times looks at reasons why the oil prices continue to hit record highs.
Schwartz believes that the basics of demand and supply cannot account for the steady climbing of prices by citing adequate supply of oil available. He finds that the answer lies in the falling dollar. The depreciation of the dollar is causing investors and traders to move their investments into crude commodities such as oil to hedge their portfolio risks. Since the oil market is a global market that is not being affected by domestic currency devaluation, investments in these goods are more stable in comparison to the dollar. The same story goes for gold prices. Since the dollar depreciation, gold prices have continued to raise, also hitting record highs. The institutional shifts of investments, by large investment institutions, into oil has caused informal investors and less informed traders to also move in this commodity. This signaling has only exacerbated the problem of inflated gas prices.
The blame for this exacerbation has been placed on these informal "speculative" traders. Therefore, the potential political response to these bad traders is to raise margin requirements for these trades. Higher requirements would force traders to take less risk because they would be forced to back up their positions with more equity. Schwartz doesn't seem convinced that these traders are the fundamental reasons why prices are so high; however, he believes that it is still worth trying.
Personally, I don't believe that speculative trading is the core reason for the price hikes in oil prices. It does, however, provide a convincing scrape goat and a easy solution. Seeing how politicians are more adverse to inaction than to actual efficacy, this seems that this policy response is adequate to keep them happy - even if it doesn't actually solve the problem. Yet, I remain skeptical that there is even a pricing mismatch problem in the case of oil as Schwartz outlines.
My gut feeling is that current oil prices are anticipating higher costs in the future due to more regulation on carbon emission. The internalization of these externalities is necessary and universally understood in economics as the best way to move towards better efficiency. However, no one said it would be an easy, painless process. These high prices will be born by everyone in the economy and are just the beginning of what is necessary to move the nation, and eventually the world, to a more efficient frontier.
Quick solutions now might cause politicians and their constituents to feel better about themselves. But, in the end, I believe that higher prices of goods are just what we should expect in the horizon because we are in the painful process of internalization of previously unaccounted externalities.
Saturday, May 17, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
After reading the article and thinking more about the issue, I actually think the article makes sense, or at least it's worth to temporarily implement this policy and see if it delivers.
Not only hedge funds, pension funds, or any other propriety traders for that matter trade around oil. During the last few months I have been interviewing for investment banks, and I have witnessed a growing trend in financial institutions to trade oil commodities and futures for their clients, which come from oil-sensitive industries.
Due to high uncertainty in the oil market, more and more corporations seek to hedge against the risk of short-run rises in oil prices. For example, think about airlines, whose profits highly depend on stable oil prices. Airlines provide ticket prices for consumers based on expectations of future oil prices. Financial innovations enables airlines to hedge against rising oil prices (in fact, I met a commodity trader in an investment bank whose main job was to trade futures to hedge against the risk of rising oil prices for airlines). I can think of many other companies who are extremely sensitive to short-run shocks in oil prices and would like to hedge against rising oil prices: shipping companies, railway companies, trucking companies, and even the food industry (modern agriculture and food transport are extremely oil-sensitive).
This creates even more upward pressure on the price of oil. It might certainly be the case that the financial market once again created a bubble and overblown oil prices. After all, it happened before on several occasions (see my blog on how financial innovations inflated American housing prices, think about the dot-com bubble, etc). If this is the case, raising the margin requirement might be a useful policy to stop a ramping horse before it's completely out of control.
In my opinion, the speculation of investors is not the only factor that drives the energy price. I think the weaker dollar itself also contributes a lot to it.
Usually, dollar is the main currency in trading the oil. If dollar is weak, the energy sellers will get back a smaller amount of money in the form of their domestic currency. As a result, the oil importers need to find someway to compensate for this issue. Many people also believe that the importers have tried to push up the price to compensate for the weaker dollar.
I agree with the article that the weak dollar partly accounts for high oil prices. The Fed's successive reduction of the FFR, and the resulting depreciation in dollar, led to the oil prices to shoot up.
Given the Fed's primary goal of maintaining long term economic stability and low inflation, the Fed's interest rate drop makes sense, but I wonder whether the Fed has to be accounted for the impact of its policy on the global market, including the oil market.
Or considering that a seemingly innocent, good-willed subsidy for ethanol production recently led the food prices to skyrocket, I feel there is a greater effort is called for nations to coordinate their policies on food and energy.
There was an article written recently in the Wall Street Journal that touched on the subject of this subject of the weakening dollar contributing to higher gas prices.
If you look at the price of oil in the last 10 years in terms of dollars- it went up 350%.
In terms of the Euro- oil went up 200%.
Interestingly, if you look at oil in the last 10 years in terms of the price of gold- it has stayed flat.
The prices of soybeans and wheat increased by 75% in 2007, far outperforming oils increase of 57% in 2007. Neither OPEC, China, or any global cartels were responsible for this increase. The weakening of the dollar is the main factor.
If the dollar had kept pace with the euro these past 10 years, a barrel of oil would cost roughly 57$ compared to over 100$.
Given our weakening economy, the Fed is under pressure to cut interest rates and provide banks with some liquidity. If this continues to weaken the dollar, we will continue to see the price of oil and other commodities rise.
Post a Comment